ISP

Content tagged with "ISP"

Related Topics
Displaying 11 - 20 of 66

2025 Predictions with Blair Levin - Episode 631 of the Community Broadband Bits Podcast

In this episode of the podcast, Chris speaks again with Blair Levin, former Director of the National Broadband Plan and current Equity Analyst at New Street Research. Together, they dive into the major issues shaping the year ahead for broadband and telecommunications.  

Levin shares insights on the evolving landscape of network ownership, media regulations, and market dynamics, while addressing pressing topics like the expiration of the Affordable Connectivity Program and its impact on affordability. The discussion also touches on the BEAD program, fixed and wireless broadband competition, and the influence of geopolitical and economic policies on deployment efforts.  

Levin critiques the Federal Communications Commission's priorities under Brendan Carr's leadership, predicts significant shifts in media ownership and content distribution, and examines the role of satellite Internet and emerging technologies. This forward-looking conversation also highlights the importance of reliable data and competitive intensity in shaping the broadband future.  

Tune in for an engaging discussion filled with expert predictions, political analysis, and reflections on the broader implications of broadband policy decisions.

This show is 45 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license

ISPs and Copyright Infringement: The Legal Battle Over Liability - Episode 618 of the Community Broadband Bits Podcast

In this episode of the podcast, Chris is joined by Professor Alfred Yen from Boston College Law School to discuss a pivotal case involving Cox Communications and copyright infringement. 

The conversation centers on whether Internet Service Providers (ISPs) should be held responsible when their subscribers engage in illegal downloading of music.

They explore the complex legal questions surrounding ISP liability, the potential consequences for smaller ISPs, and how this could reshape the relationship between copyright holders and service providers. 

Professor Yen provides insight into the impact this case could have on Internet users and ISPs, especially as the music industry seeks to make ISPs financially accountable for their subscribers' actions.

The episode also touches on broader concerns about how cutting off Internet access could affect critical services like healthcare and business operations, making this a pressing issue with far-reaching implications.

This show is 33 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license

ISPs and Copyright Infringement: The Legal Battle Over Liability - Episode 618 of the Community Broadband Bits Podcast

In this episode of the podcast, Chris is joined by Professor Alfred Yen from Boston College Law School to discuss a pivotal case involving Cox Communications and copyright infringement. 

The conversation centers on whether Internet Service Providers (ISPs) should be held responsible when their subscribers engage in illegal downloading of music.

They explore the complex legal questions surrounding ISP liability, the potential consequences for smaller ISPs, and how this could reshape the relationship between copyright holders and service providers. 

Professor Yen provides insight into the impact this case could have on Internet users and ISPs, especially as the music industry seeks to make ISPs financially accountable for their subscribers' actions.

The episode also touches on broader concerns about how cutting off Internet access could affect critical services like healthcare and business operations, making this a pressing issue with far-reaching implications.

This show is 33 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license

ISPs and Copyright Infringement: The Legal Battle Over Liability - Episode 618 of the Community Broadband Bits Podcast

In this episode of the podcast, Chris is joined by Professor Alfred Yen from Boston College Law School to discuss a pivotal case involving Cox Communications and copyright infringement. 

The conversation centers on whether Internet Service Providers (ISPs) should be held responsible when their subscribers engage in illegal downloading of music.

They explore the complex legal questions surrounding ISP liability, the potential consequences for smaller ISPs, and how this could reshape the relationship between copyright holders and service providers. 

Professor Yen provides insight into the impact this case could have on Internet users and ISPs, especially as the music industry seeks to make ISPs financially accountable for their subscribers' actions.

The episode also touches on broader concerns about how cutting off Internet access could affect critical services like healthcare and business operations, making this a pressing issue with far-reaching implications.

This show is 33 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license

ISPs and Copyright Infringement: The Legal Battle Over Liability - Episode 618 of the Community Broadband Bits Podcast

In this episode of the podcast, Chris is joined by Professor Alfred Yen from Boston College Law School to discuss a pivotal case involving Cox Communications and copyright infringement. 

The conversation centers on whether Internet Service Providers (ISPs) should be held responsible when their subscribers engage in illegal downloading of music.

They explore the complex legal questions surrounding ISP liability, the potential consequences for smaller ISPs, and how this could reshape the relationship between copyright holders and service providers. 

Professor Yen provides insight into the impact this case could have on Internet users and ISPs, especially as the music industry seeks to make ISPs financially accountable for their subscribers' actions.

The episode also touches on broader concerns about how cutting off Internet access could affect critical services like healthcare and business operations, making this a pressing issue with far-reaching implications.

This show is 33 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license

ISPs and Copyright Infringement: The Legal Battle Over Liability - Episode 618 of the Community Broadband Bits Podcast

In this episode of the podcast, Chris is joined by Professor Alfred Yen from Boston College Law School to discuss a pivotal case involving Cox Communications and copyright infringement. 

The conversation centers on whether Internet Service Providers (ISPs) should be held responsible when their subscribers engage in illegal downloading of music.

They explore the complex legal questions surrounding ISP liability, the potential consequences for smaller ISPs, and how this could reshape the relationship between copyright holders and service providers. 

Professor Yen provides insight into the impact this case could have on Internet users and ISPs, especially as the music industry seeks to make ISPs financially accountable for their subscribers' actions.

The episode also touches on broader concerns about how cutting off Internet access could affect critical services like healthcare and business operations, making this a pressing issue with far-reaching implications.

This show is 33 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license

ISPs and Copyright Infringement: The Legal Battle Over Liability - Episode 618 of the Community Broadband Bits Podcast

In this episode of the podcast, Chris is joined by Professor Alfred Yen from Boston College Law School to discuss a pivotal case involving Cox Communications and copyright infringement. 

The conversation centers on whether Internet Service Providers (ISPs) should be held responsible when their subscribers engage in illegal downloading of music.

They explore the complex legal questions surrounding ISP liability, the potential consequences for smaller ISPs, and how this could reshape the relationship between copyright holders and service providers. 

Professor Yen provides insight into the impact this case could have on Internet users and ISPs, especially as the music industry seeks to make ISPs financially accountable for their subscribers' actions.

The episode also touches on broader concerns about how cutting off Internet access could affect critical services like healthcare and business operations, making this a pressing issue with far-reaching implications.

This show is 33 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license

CBN’s Signal to Noise Ratios Week of July 24

In this week’s round-up of broadband news, we culled three stories we think are worth reading.

How Much is Fast Enough?

The first is a story from Ars Technica – FCC chair: Speed standard of 25Mbps down, 3Mbps up isn’t good enough anymore – written by veteran IT reporter Jon Brodkin.

For years now, broadband-for-all advocates have lamented the FCC’s minimum broadband speed standard of 25 Megabits per second (Mbps) download and 3 Mbps upload as being laughably antiquated. Indeed, it’s been almost three years since we made the case for Why 25/3 Broadband Is Not Sufficient, though it was outdated long before then.

Image
Speed Test

But as Brodkin reported this week, the FCC’s minimum speed standard “could finally change under Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, who is proposing a fixed broadband standard of 100Mbps downloads and 20Mbps uploads along with a goal of bringing affordable service at those speeds to all Americans.”

Under Rosenworcel’s plan, the FCC would look at availability, speeds, and prices to determine whether the agency should take regulatory actions under Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act, which requires the FCC to determine if high-speed Internet access is being deployed "on a reasonable and timely basis" to all Americans.

CBN’s Signal to Noise Ratios Week of July 24

In this week’s round-up of broadband news, we culled three stories we think are worth reading.

How Much is Fast Enough?

The first is a story from Ars Technica – FCC chair: Speed standard of 25Mbps down, 3Mbps up isn’t good enough anymore – written by veteran IT reporter Jon Brodkin.

For years now, broadband-for-all advocates have lamented the FCC’s minimum broadband speed standard of 25 Megabits per second (Mbps) download and 3 Mbps upload as being laughably antiquated. Indeed, it’s been almost three years since we made the case for Why 25/3 Broadband Is Not Sufficient, though it was outdated long before then.

Image
Speed Test

But as Brodkin reported this week, the FCC’s minimum speed standard “could finally change under Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, who is proposing a fixed broadband standard of 100Mbps downloads and 20Mbps uploads along with a goal of bringing affordable service at those speeds to all Americans.”

Under Rosenworcel’s plan, the FCC would look at availability, speeds, and prices to determine whether the agency should take regulatory actions under Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act, which requires the FCC to determine if high-speed Internet access is being deployed "on a reasonable and timely basis" to all Americans.

CBN’s Signal to Noise Ratios Week of July 24

In this week’s round-up of broadband news, we culled three stories we think are worth reading.

How Much is Fast Enough?

The first is a story from Ars Technica – FCC chair: Speed standard of 25Mbps down, 3Mbps up isn’t good enough anymore – written by veteran IT reporter Jon Brodkin.

For years now, broadband-for-all advocates have lamented the FCC’s minimum broadband speed standard of 25 Megabits per second (Mbps) download and 3 Mbps upload as being laughably antiquated. Indeed, it’s been almost three years since we made the case for Why 25/3 Broadband Is Not Sufficient, though it was outdated long before then.

Image
Speed Test

But as Brodkin reported this week, the FCC’s minimum speed standard “could finally change under Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, who is proposing a fixed broadband standard of 100Mbps downloads and 20Mbps uploads along with a goal of bringing affordable service at those speeds to all Americans.”

Under Rosenworcel’s plan, the FCC would look at availability, speeds, and prices to determine whether the agency should take regulatory actions under Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act, which requires the FCC to determine if high-speed Internet access is being deployed "on a reasonable and timely basis" to all Americans.