Network Neutrality Opponents Totally Out of Touch With Reality

The mystery of who and what killed the California Affordable Home Internet Act is coming into view. The evidence seems to be pointing to the new leadership now directing the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. In a recently released FAQ published by the NTIA this week, a corroborating clue has emerged. And what may be the smoking gun is a bullet buried on page 48, under section 3.29.

Last week, a California Assemblymember who had sponsored legislation for a broadband affordability law abruptly withdrew the legislation. But what really killed the broadband affordability bill in California? In explaining why Assemblymember Tasha Boerner withdrew the legislation, she did not say it was because of the pushback her office was getting from digital inclusion advocates across the state – or because of industry objections for that matter. Boerner laid it at the feet of the Trump administration.

ILSR publishes new piece in The American Prospect on how the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" cuts food assistance benefits to households that pay for internet access.

California lawmakers’ efforts to pass a new law mandating affordable broadband access is at risk of being destroyed by industry lobbying. California insiders say the changes are so dramatic they may wind up making broadband affordability in the state worse – undermining years of digital equity activism and discarding a rare opportunity to bridge the digital divide.

The Trump administration’s dismantling of a popular broadband grant program has been greeted with disgust and anger by those working to bridge the digital divide, leaving many states' planned broadband expansions in limbo, and affordable broadband advocates contemplating potential legal action. The unprecedented choice to destroy digital skills training and broadband adoption programs created by an act of Congress is seeing escalating pushback by a growing coalition of frustrated lawmakers and state broadband offices.

Legislation that would require ISPs operating in Massachusetts to offer qualifying low-income households high-speed Internet service for $15 per month is set to have its first legislative hearing today. The hearing in Massachusetts comes as similar legislation is being considered by state lawmakers in Vermont and California – all three of which are modeled on New York’s Affordable Broadband Act.